From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toft v. Ketchum

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 20, 1955
114 A.2d 863 (N.J. 1955)

Opinion

Reargued June 13, 1955 —

Decided June 20, 1955.

On reargument.

Mr. Martin Kimmel argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Oliver R. Kovacs argued the cause for the respondent.

Mr. Harry Green, Mr. Lionel P. Kristeller, Miss Emma E. Dillon, and Mr. Franklin H. Berry filed a brief on behalf of the New Jersey State Bar Association, amicus curiae.


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Vanderbilt heretofore filed. Mr. Justice Jacobs votes to affirm for the reasons expressed in his concurring opinion previously filed. Mr. Justice Wachenfeld and Mr. Justice Burling vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in their respective dissenting opinions previously filed. See 18 N.J. 280 (1955).

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 5.

For reversal — Justices WACHENFELD and BURLING — 2.


Summaries of

Toft v. Ketchum

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 20, 1955
114 A.2d 863 (N.J. 1955)
Case details for

Toft v. Ketchum

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD LIONEL TOFT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARY G. KETCHUM…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 20, 1955

Citations

114 A.2d 863 (N.J. 1955)
114 A.2d 863

Citing Cases

In re Szczepanik

In re Caruba, 139 N.J. Eq. 404, 427 ( Ch. 1947), affirmed 140 N.J. Eq. 563 ( E. A. 1947), petition denied 142…

Grodjesk v. Faghani

Our analysis proceeds from the proposition that every regulated professional, except an attorney at law, is…