From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Todd v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 15, 1943
139 F.2d 700 (6th Cir. 1943)

Opinion

No. 9694.

December 15, 1943.

Petition to Review Order of Securities and Exchange Commission.

Howell VanAuken and Lucking, VanAuken, Schumann Greiner, all of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

John F. Davis, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.

Before SIMONS, HAMILTON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.


Petitioner having filed a petition to review an alleged "order" entered by respondent on October 5, 1943, refusing to amend the application filed by respondent in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, under Section 11(d) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79k(d), by deleting respondent's request for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate alleged claims for rescission in favor of International Hydro-Electric System against International Paper Company and its predecessors, and the court having considered the matter on respondent's motion to dismiss and being advised in the premises:

It is now ordered that the petition for review be and it hereby is dismissed on the ground that the Commission did not, on or about October 5, 1943, enter any order with reference to petitioner or International Hydro-Electric System which is reviewable within the meaning of Section 24(a) of the said Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79x(a).

Provided that this order is without prejudice to any right of judicial review which petitioner may have under the said Act in the future.


Summaries of

Todd v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 15, 1943
139 F.2d 700 (6th Cir. 1943)
Case details for

Todd v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Case Details

Full title:Paul H. TODD, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 15, 1943

Citations

139 F.2d 700 (6th Cir. 1943)

Citing Cases

PBW Stock Exchange, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

Courts have, of course, held some Commission action unreviewable under section 25(a) and under section 24(a)…