From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tiringer v. Grafenecker

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 26, 1962
38 Misc. 2d 29 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)

Opinion

October 26, 1962

Appeal from the District Court of the County of Nassau, FRANCIS J. DONOVAN, J.

Benjamin Beskin for appellant.


Order should be unanimously modified by providing that plaintiffs' former attorney shall have a lien on the proceeds of the action realized by trial or settlement for disbursements in the sum of $98.15 advanced by him, and for the reasonable value of his services rendered prior to the order of disbarment; the value of such services shall be determined by the court at the trial of the issues or upon application after settlement of the action; and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Absent any showing that plaintiffs' former attorney was disbarred for conduct in connection with the case in question, he is entitled to a lien for his disbursements and for legal services rendered prior to his disbarment. ( Flecha v. Goodman, 31 Misc.2d 444; Torgerson v. Harboro Associates, N YL.J., June 12, 1962, p. 17, col. 2 [Supreme Ct., Kings County]; Alexander v. Kraemer, N.Y.L.J., March 27, 1962, p. 14, col. 1 [Supreme Ct., Kings County].)

Concur — HART, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.

Order modified, etc.


Summaries of

Tiringer v. Grafenecker

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 26, 1962
38 Misc. 2d 29 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
Case details for

Tiringer v. Grafenecker

Case Details

Full title:FRANK TIRINGER et al., Respondents, v. ROBERT W. GRAFENECKER et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1962

Citations

38 Misc. 2d 29 (N.Y. App. Term 1962)
239 N.Y.S.2d 567

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Jones

When an attorney is denied a fee the authorities speak of it as a penalty visited upon him for misconduct (…

Pollock v. Wetterau Food Distribution

Under this theory, an attorney is allowed to recover for the reasonable value of services rendered prior to…