From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinston v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1963
192 N.E.2d 271 (N.Y. 1963)

Opinion

Argued June 5, 1963

Decided July 10, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, PETER A. QUINN, J.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel ( Seymour B. Quel, John F. Kelly and Leon A. Fischel of counsel), for appellants.

John P. McGrath for respondent.


could meet its specifications. The following question was certified: "Does the complaint herein state a cause of action?"


Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

Tinston v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1963
192 N.E.2d 271 (N.Y. 1963)
Case details for

Tinston v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. TINSTON, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 10, 1963

Citations

192 N.E.2d 271 (N.Y. 1963)
192 N.E.2d 271
242 N.Y.S.2d 490

Citing Cases

Murtha v. Incorporated Village of Island Park

Accordingly, the defendants were properly awarded summary judgment and the complaint was properly dismissed.…

Gerzof v. Sweeney

rt long ago declared, "upon motives of public economy, and originated, perhaps, in some degree of distrust of…