From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinkoff v. Campbell

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Jan 18, 1947
158 F.2d 855 (7th Cir. 1947)

Opinion

No. 8962.

December 23, 1946. Rehearing Denied January 18, 1947.

Appeal from District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division; John P. Barnes, Judge.

Suit by Paysoff Tinkoff against Nigel D. Campbell, Collector of Internal Revenue, and others, to enjoin the Collector from interfering with the plaintiff's rights to conduct his business and for other relief. From a judgment dismissing the petition, the plaintiff appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Paysoff Tinkoff, of Chicago, Ill., pro se.

J. Albert Woll, U.S. Atty., and John M. Kiely, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Chicago, Ill., Douglas W. McGregor, Sewall Key, and Hilbert P. Zarky, Dept. of Justice, all of Washington, D.C., and Robert N. Anderson and Lee A. Jackson, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., for appellees.

Before SPARKS and KERNER, Circuit Judges, and LINDLEY, District Judge.


Appellant is a disbarred attorney. Since his disbarment he has established offices in which he acts "as a layman and accountant, and not as an attorney, certified public accountant or public accountant, or as an attorney or agent licensed to practice before the Treasury Department." His business in part consists of advising taxpayers in filling out income tax returns. Appellee, as Collector of Internal Revenue for the First Collection District of Illinois, acting under the authority of Section 7(d) of Treasury Department Circular No. 230, published pursuant to 5 U.S.C.A. § 261, has refused to permit him to represent taxpayers in explaining adjustments and computations in their returns or to accompany them upon interviews necessitated by such returns. Appellant contends that this action unduly restricts his constitutional rights of liberty, property and pursuit of happiness, and accordingly sued to enjoin the Collector from interfering with his rights to conduct his business as a layman, and for other relief.

We find no merit whatever in any of the contentions raised by appellant and are fully in accord with the action of the District Court in dismissing the petition for injunction.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Tinkoff v. Campbell

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Jan 18, 1947
158 F.2d 855 (7th Cir. 1947)
Case details for

Tinkoff v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:TINKOFF v. CAMPBELL et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 1947

Citations

158 F.2d 855 (7th Cir. 1947)

Citing Cases

Tinkoff v. Campbell

such conspiracy through certain alleged tortious acts and Count II is a complaint at law alleging said…