From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tinaco Plaza v. Freebob's, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 25, 2003
263 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2003)

Opinion

Decided March 25, 2003


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 74 Conn. App. 760 (AC 21992), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's granting of summary judgment based upon its determination that a certain lease provision was an option to renew that required the written consent of the plaintiff and the renegotiation of a new rent?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16970. Lloyd L. Langhammer, in support of the petition.

Kevin J. Burns, in opposition.


Summaries of

Tinaco Plaza v. Freebob's, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 25, 2003
263 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2003)
Case details for

Tinaco Plaza v. Freebob's, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TINACO PLAZA, LLC v. FREEBOB'S, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 25, 2003

Citations

263 Conn. 904 (Conn. 2003)
819 A.2d 840

Citing Cases

D.S.A. Properties, LLC v. Pina

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob’s, Inc., 74 Conn.App. 760, 766-67, 814 A.2d…

Commerce Park Assocs. v. Robbins

Moreover, Commerce Park's argument, if valid, would render meaningless and unenforceable the very distinction…