From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. United States

U.S.
Jun 23, 1969
395 U.S. 830 (1969)

Summary

construing the Federal counterpart, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8, as mandatorily requiring severance in the case of misjoinder

Summary of this case from Macklin v. State

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

No. 1879, Misc.

Decided June 23, 1969.

Certiorari granted as to petitioner Fox and denied as to all other petitioners; 406 F.2d 930, vacated in part and remanded.

Howard Moore, Jr., for petitioners.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari as to petitioner Fox are granted. The judgment is vacated in part and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165. MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents. As to all other petitioners the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.


Summaries of

Tillman v. United States

U.S.
Jun 23, 1969
395 U.S. 830 (1969)

construing the Federal counterpart, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8, as mandatorily requiring severance in the case of misjoinder

Summary of this case from Macklin v. State
Case details for

Tillman v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TILLMAN ET AL. v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 23, 1969

Citations

395 U.S. 830 (1969)
89 S. Ct. 2143

Citing Cases

United States v. Park

This is not precisely correct. The government, as well as some courts, e. g., Williams v. United States, 9…

United States v. Wasson

A claim of misjoinder under Rule 8 is reviewable on appeal as a question of law. United States v. Levine, 546…