From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tillman v. Averett

Supreme Court of California
Jan 27, 1890
82 Cal. 576 (Cal. 1890)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County.

         COUNSEL:

         William H. Webb, for Appellant.

          Geil & Morehouse, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Thornton, J. McFarland, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          THORNTON, Judge

         Appeal from a judgment by plaintiff.

         The complaint states his cause of action, in which the pleader sets it forth by using the common counts for goods sold and delivered, for services performed and money paid, etc.

         The defendants denied the allegations of the complaint, and set up a counterclaim by proper averments.

         The action seems to involve a settlement of the respective accounts of the parties.

         The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to a judgment, and entered judgment for defendants for their costs.

         We find no error in the record. The evidence is not before us in any shape in which we can consider it. There is no bill of exceptions and no statement, and if there was, the appeal was not taken within sixty days after the rendition of the judgment, so as to entitle the appellant to have it considered by the court.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Tillman v. Averett

Supreme Court of California
Jan 27, 1890
82 Cal. 576 (Cal. 1890)
Case details for

Tillman v. Averett

Case Details

Full title:JOHN G. TILLMAN, Appellant, v. A. E. AVERETT et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 27, 1890

Citations

82 Cal. 576 (Cal. 1890)
23 P. 875

Citing Cases

Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. Martin

And it is further held that where the artificial watercourse was not created by joint action of the owners,…

Wutchumna Water Co. v. Pogue

Moreover, plaintiff had the undoubted legal right to adopt and use its original method of appropriation, —…