From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tilley v. New Peoples Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION
Feb 13, 2012
Case No. 1:11CV00091 (W.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11CV00091

02-13-2012

THOMAS TILLEY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. NEW PEOPLES BANK, ET AL., Defendants.


OPINION


By: James P. Jones

United States District Judge

This matter comes before the court on defendants' motions to dismiss this removal action. Because I find the action was improperly removed to federal court by the plaintiffs, I will remand the case to state court.

The plaintiffs, represented by counsel, brought an action in state court seeking to enjoin the foreclosure of property located in Smyth County, Virginia. On December 21, 2011, the plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed in this court a pleading entitled "Removal of Virginia Civil Action to Federal Court Pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. Section 1441(b) Clause I, and Title 28, Section 1331, Accompanying." There is no indication that notice of removal was given to the state court, as required by law. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1446(d) (West 2006).

On December 22, 2011, a hearing was held on the injunction action before the Circuit Court of Smyth County, Virginia, and the court decided against the plaintiffs. As is the procedure in Virginia state court, the attorneys in that action circulated an order dismissing the state complaint for an injunction and tendered it to the court. That order was entered on February 1, 2012.

The statute governing the removal of civil actions to federal court states that "any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or defendants, to the district court of the United States." 28 U.S.C.A §1441(a) (West 2006) (emphasis added); see Chi., Rock Island. & Pac. R.R. v. Stude, 346 U.S. 574, 580 (1954) (holding that because the railroad was the plaintiff, it could not remove the case to federal court). The plaintiffs in this case elected to bring their case in state court and they may not avail themselves of the removal statute.

Accordingly, because removal to this court was improper, I will remand the case to state court and direct the clerk of this court to dismiss the case from the docket. A separate order will be entered herewith.

James P. Jones

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Tilley v. New Peoples Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION
Feb 13, 2012
Case No. 1:11CV00091 (W.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Tilley v. New Peoples Bank

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS TILLEY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. NEW PEOPLES BANK, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 13, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11CV00091 (W.D. Va. Feb. 13, 2012)