Opinion
Argued October 8, 1883
Decided November 20, 1883
Robert P. Harlow for appellant.
Nathaniel C. Moak for respondent.
FINCH, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Tice v. Munn
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1883
94 N.Y. 621 (N.Y. 1883)
Summaries of
Tice v. Munn
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1883
94 N.Y. 621 (N.Y. 1883)
Case details for
Tice v. Munn
Case Details
Full title:MARIA TICE, Respondent, v . HENRY N. MUNN, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 20, 1883
Citations
94 N.Y. 621 (N.Y. 1883)
Citing Cases
Turner v. Nassau Electric R.R. Co.
The briefs submitted by the defendant's counsel do not cite any authorities on the question, and we have not…
Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc.(See 1 Cooley on Torts [4th ed.], § 53, pp. 140-141; Seavey, Cardozo and the Law of Torts, 52 Harv. L. Rev.…