From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thornton v. Natchez

U.S.
Nov 30, 1908
212 U.S. 559 (1908)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI.

No. 462.

Motion to dismiss or affirm. — Submitted November 16, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908.

Writ of error to review judgment of state court, 88 Miss. 1, dismissed for want of jurisdiction under § 709, Rev. Stat., without opinion.

Mr. Robert H. Thompson, Mr. Thomas A. McWillie and Mr. William C. Martin for defendants in error in support of the motion.

Mr. Wade R. Young for plaintiffs in error in opposition to motion to dismiss.


Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Thornton v. Natchez, 88 Miss. 1; S.C., 129 F. 86, 87; S.C., 197 U.S. 620; Harrison v. Myer, 92 U.S. 111; Moran v. Horsky, 178 U.S. 205; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co., 125 U.S. 18; St. Paul Gas Light Co. v. St. Paul, 181 U.S. 142, 148; Beals v. Cone, 188 U.S. 184; Winona St. Peter Railroad Company v. Plainview, 143 U.S. 371, 390; Hammond v. Johnston, 142 U.S. 73.


Summaries of

Thornton v. Natchez

U.S.
Nov 30, 1908
212 U.S. 559 (1908)
Case details for

Thornton v. Natchez

Case Details

Full title:THORNTON v . CITY OF NATCHEZ

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 30, 1908

Citations

212 U.S. 559 (1908)

Citing Cases

Hamilton v. City of Jackson

While it is perfectly true that there is a distinction between a limitation and a condition subsequent, yet…

Lundy v. Hazlett

She had ample time and opportunity at any time after July 24, 1918, before the bar of the statute of…