From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 26, 1996
667 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-03463.

January 26, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Lee E. Haworth, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Julia Diaz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Jerry L. Thompson has appealed from his conviction for attempted second degree murder. We find no error in the asserted impermissible admission of evidence, and we affirm the judgment and sentence.

Certain special conditions of probation imposed at sentencing, however, were not orally pronounced and must be stricken: (1) portions of condition number four that prohibit carrying of weapons not enumerated in section 790.23, Florida Statutes (1993); (2) that portion of condition number seven prohibiting the defendant from using intoxicants to excess; and (3) that portion of condition twelve requiring the defendant to pay for breathalyzer, blood, or urine tests, unless the fee is waived by an officer. Malone v. State, 652 So.2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Furthermore, the $2.00 cost imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), should also be stricken. Watson v. State, 647 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Judgment and sentence affirmed but we strike the improper probation conditions and the $2.00 cost.

LAZZARA and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 26, 1996
667 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Thompson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JERRY L. THOMPSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 26, 1996

Citations

667 So. 2d 447 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Lazo v. State

The $2 discretionary cost must be stricken because it was not pronounced orally at sentencing. See Thompson…