From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thompson v. Spraig

Supreme Court of California
Jan 14, 1885
66 Cal. 350 (Cal. 1885)

Opinion

         Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the county of Amador, denying a motion to vacate and set aside a judgment.

         COUNSEL:

         Eagon & Armstrong, for Appellants.

          Rust & Caminetti, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: In Bank. Ross, J. McKee, J., Myrick, J., McKinstry, J., Morrison, C. J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          ROSS, Judge

         The cross-complaint having been stricken from the answer of the defendant, the latter pleading was left with matters of defense only. The plaintiffs were, therefore, at liberty to dismiss the action at any time before trial, upon payment of costs. (Code of Civil Procedure, § 581.) This they did -- the dismissal having been entered by the clerk. The purported trial of the 5th of November, 1883, was therefore of an action which had been previously dismissed.

         [2 Cal.Unrep. 435]Order reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the court below to set aside the judgment.


Summaries of

Thompson v. Spraig

Supreme Court of California
Jan 14, 1885
66 Cal. 350 (Cal. 1885)
Case details for

Thompson v. Spraig

Case Details

Full title:A. THOMPSON et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAM SPRAIG, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 14, 1885

Citations

66 Cal. 350 (Cal. 1885)
2 Cal. Unrep. 434
5 P. 506

Citing Cases

Sullivan v. Compton

[5] Since no affirmative relief was sought by the answer of the defendants (sec. 581, Code Civ. Proc.) the…

Islais Etc. Water Co. v. Allen

" Appellant also cites Thompson v. Spraig, 66 Cal. 350, where it was held that "when a cross-complaint has…