From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. U.S. Bank Nat'l

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
May 4, 2006
No. 09-05-370 CV (Tex. App. May. 4, 2006)

Opinion

No. 09-05-370 CV

Opinion Delivered May 4, 2006.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law, Polk County, Texas, Trial Cause No. CV02157.

Appeal Dismissed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., GAULTNEY and HORTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On January 5, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. Appellant received additional extensions of time to file the record and pay the filing fee, but failed to comply by the April 20, 2006, final extension deadline. The appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex.R.App.P. 20.1. The filing fee not having been paid, and there being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App.P. 37.3(b). Costs are assessed against appellant.


Summaries of

Thomas v. U.S. Bank Nat'l

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
May 4, 2006
No. 09-05-370 CV (Tex. App. May. 4, 2006)
Case details for

Thomas v. U.S. Bank Nat'l

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE THOMAS, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, F/K/A FIRST…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: May 4, 2006

Citations

No. 09-05-370 CV (Tex. App. May. 4, 2006)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Select Portfolio

When Thomas failed to vacate, U.S. Bank filed a forcible entry and detainer suit, which resulted in judgment…