From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. HCC-High Capacity Coil, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Aug 15, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-00017 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2014)

Summary

granting conditional certification of all "non-managerial field personnel" at coil tubing company, where plaintiff had requested certification of all non-exempt employees

Summary of this case from McPherson v. Leam Drilling Sys., LLC

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-00017

08-15-2014

ERNEST THOMAS, et al, Plaintiffs, v. HCC-HIGH CAPACITY COIL, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On July 29, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation" (D.E. 33). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.

When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).

Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 33), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS AS MODIFIED the Motion for Certification of Collective Action and Request for Notice to Potential Class Members (D.E. 27), with the putative class being "ALL NON-MANAGERIAL FIELD PERSONNEL EMPLOYED BY HCC—HIGH CAPACITY COIL, LLC—WITHIN THE PAST THREE YEARS, WHO RECEIVED DAY RATE JOB BONUSES BUT WERE NOT PAID OVERTIME."

The Court ORDERS the parties to file a proposed joint notice to potential plaintiffs and a proposed joint notice of consent with seven (7) days of this Order. The Court further refers the case to Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby for case management, including handling objections to the notice and consent forms, entering an order regarding setting the notice period, posting/sending the notice to potential class members, the disclosure of putative plaintiffs, and any other pending pre-trial matters.

ORDERED this 15th day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. HCC-High Capacity Coil, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Aug 15, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-00017 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2014)

granting conditional certification of all "non-managerial field personnel" at coil tubing company, where plaintiff had requested certification of all non-exempt employees

Summary of this case from McPherson v. Leam Drilling Sys., LLC
Case details for

Thomas v. HCC-High Capacity Coil, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST THOMAS, et al, Plaintiffs, v. HCC-HIGH CAPACITY COIL, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Aug 15, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-00017 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

McPherson v. Leam Drilling Sys., LLC

"Operators Is," excluding "Operator IIs" and "Operator IIIs" without explanation. Jeremiah Bills, et al, v.…