From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Capital Sec. Services, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 9, 1987
822 F.2d 511 (5th Cir. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-4480.

July 9, 1987.

M. Curtiss McKee, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

Deborah A. McDonald, Mary Brown, Natchez, Miss., Willie L. Rose, McComb, Miss., George Cochran, University, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; William H. Barbour, Jr., Judge.

(Opinion March 20, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 812 F.2d 984)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.


A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Capital Sec. Services, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 9, 1987
822 F.2d 511 (5th Cir. 1987)
Case details for

Thomas v. Capital Sec. Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA THOMAS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. CAPITAL SECURITY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jul 9, 1987

Citations

822 F.2d 511 (5th Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Shivangi v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

Thomas v. Capital Sec. Serv., Inc., 812 F.2d 984, 989 (5th Cir. 1987) (quoting Robinson v. National Cash…

In re Kearney

Second, it is also generally accepted that the standard to be applied is objective, rather than subjective,…