From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION: "B"(1)
Oct 30, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 12-2818 (E.D. La. Oct. 30, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 12-2818

10-30-2013

JAMES THOMAS v. N. BURL CAIN, WARDEN


ORDER, REASONS AND JUDGMENT

Based upon our reviews of the state court proceedings, petitioner's claims, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, petitioner's objections (Record Document Number 15) to same, and applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner' objections are OVERRULED and we hereby ADOPT the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Record Document Number 14) as our opinion and reasons in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition of James Thomas for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 30th day of October, 2013.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Thomas v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION: "B"(1)
Oct 30, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 12-2818 (E.D. La. Oct. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Thomas v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:JAMES THOMAS v. N. BURL CAIN, WARDEN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SECTION: "B"(1)

Date published: Oct 30, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 12-2818 (E.D. La. Oct. 30, 2013)

Citing Cases

Narcisse v. Cain

1989) ("even assuming there were omissions in the transcripts, appellant cannot prevail without a showing of…