From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Black

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 18, 1928
161 N.E. 208 (Ohio 1928)

Opinion

No. 20820

Decided April 18, 1928.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Weight of evidence not reviewed — Court of Appeals reversed common pleas court which directed verdict — Evidence to sustain agency of automobile driver — Negligence.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Mahoning county.

Mr. William E. Pfau, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Osborne Phillips, for defendant in error.


This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The machine of Thomas, the defendant below, was being driven by Mabel Brown, his stepdaughter, while the owner was not in the car. At the trial a verdict for the defendant was directed on the ground that it was not shown that Mabel Brown was the agent of the owner. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the cause to the court of common pleas, for the reason that "said court erred in directing a verdict at close of plaintiff's testimony on the ground that plaintiff's evidence did not show a scintilla of evidence establishing agency." On consideration of the entire record, this court is of the opinion that the question of agency was one of fact to be determined by inferences to be drawn from the evidence adduced, and that a reversal of the Court of Appeals would involve a determination of the weight and probative force of such inferences. This court not being required to weigh the evidence, the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE, ROBINSON and JONES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Black

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 18, 1928
161 N.E. 208 (Ohio 1928)
Case details for

Thomas v. Black

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS v. BLACK

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 18, 1928

Citations

161 N.E. 208 (Ohio 1928)
161 N.E. 208

Citing Cases

Halkias v. Wilkoff Co.

Klunk v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co., 74 Ohio St. 125, 77 N.E. 752; Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Jaite, an Infant,…