From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas Oswald Gen. Carpentry & Builders, LLC v. McEvoy

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 3, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2011-189986 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-189986 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-544

10-03-2012

Thomas Oswald General Carpentry & Builders, LLC, Respondent, v. Kathleen B. McEvoy and William H. Campbell, Appellants.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Fairfield County

R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Edward M. Woodward, Jr., of Woodward Cothran &

Herndon, of Columbia, for Appellants.

E. Crosby Lewis, of Winnsboro, and Thomas Jefferson

Goodwyn, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM : In this appeal from a jury verdict awarding Respondent $36,009.76 in actual damages for breach of contract, Appellants argue the trial court erred by denying their motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) because there was no evidence of a subsequent oral modification to the parties' written contract. We find no error of law in the trial court's ruling and evidence exists to support the decision to deny Appellants' motions. Therefore, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Campbell v. Robinson, 398 S.C. 12, 19, 726 S.E.2d 221, 225 (Ct. App. 2012) (providing an appellate court will reverse the trial court's ruling denying motions for directed verdict and JNOV only when there is no evidence to support the ruling or when the ruling is controlled by an error of law (citation omitted)); ESA Servs., LLC v. S.C. Dep't of Revenue, 392 S.C. 11, 23, 707 S.E.2d 431, 438 (Ct. App. 2011) (providing the parties to a written contract may orally modify the contract, even if the writing itself prohibits oral modification (citation omitted)); id. ("Any modification of a written contract must satisfy all fundamental elements of a valid contract in order for it to be enforceable, including a meeting of the minds between the parties with regard to all essential terms of the agreement." (citing Player v. Chandler, 299 S.C. 101, 104-05, 382 S.E.2d 891, 893 (1989))).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thomas Oswald Gen. Carpentry & Builders, LLC v. McEvoy

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 3, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2011-189986 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Thomas Oswald Gen. Carpentry & Builders, LLC v. McEvoy

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Oswald General Carpentry & Builders, LLC, Respondent, v. Kathleen…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 3, 2012

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2011-189986 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 3, 2012)