From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Lerman

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jul 14, 1951
107 F. Supp. 835 (D.D.C. 1951)

Opinion

Civ. A. 4378-49.

July 14, 1951.

David W. Louisell, Samuel Spencer, Frank S. Ketcham, Frank J. Whalen, Jr., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Herbert J. Jacobi, Washington, D.C., for defendants.


Judgment for plaintiff.

Counterclaim dismissed.

Defendants have established no common law mark, since that used by them has acquired no secondary meaning and is purely descriptive. I doubt further that it could acquire a secondary meaning in the sense that term has been defined by the Supreme Court. Apart from that, the defendants have failed it would seem to actively merchandise the product for at least the last three years.

Counsel will prepare proper order.


Summaries of

Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Lerman

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jul 14, 1951
107 F. Supp. 835 (D.D.C. 1951)
Case details for

Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Lerman

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS J. LIPTON, Inc. v. LERMAN et al

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jul 14, 1951

Citations

107 F. Supp. 835 (D.D.C. 1951)

Citing Cases

Dietene Co. v. Dietrim Co.

Skinner Mfg. Co. v. Kellogg Sales Co., 8 Cir., 1944, 143 F.2d 895. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Lerman, D.C.D.C.…