From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thigpen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 17, 1983
303 S.E.2d 81 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

66028.

DECIDED MARCH 17, 1983.

D.U.I. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Carlisle.

B. W. Crecelius, Jr., for appellant.

John R. Thompson, Solicitor, David M. Fuller, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.


The defendant pled guilty to driving under the influence, and on January 3, 1980, was sentenced by the State Court of DeKalb County to 12 months probation and payment of a $750 fine. On August 25, 1982, he moved to vacate and set aside that sentence, contending that he was not properly advised of his rights at the time he entered his plea. This appeal is from the denial of that motion. Held:

During the term in which they are rendered, judgments of criminal conviction are in the breast of the trial court and may, therefore, be vacated for good cause shown. Conlogue v. State, 243 Ga. 141, 143 ( 253 S.E.2d 168) (1979). However, after the original term has passed, a motion to vacate and set aside the judgment is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case. See Waye v. State, 239 Ga. 871, 874 ( 238 S.E.2d 923) (1977); Parker v. State, 151 Ga. App. 139 ( 259 S.E.2d 145) (1979). While such a motion may, in appropriate circumstances, be treated as a habeas corpus petition, the trial court in this case, not being a superior court, had no jurisdiction to adopt such an approach. See generally OCGA § 9-14-43 (Code Ann. § 50-127). It follows that the defendant's motion was properly denied.

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 17, 1983.


Summaries of

Thigpen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 17, 1983
303 S.E.2d 81 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Thigpen v. State

Case Details

Full title:THIGPEN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 17, 1983

Citations

303 S.E.2d 81 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
303 S.E.2d 81

Citing Cases

State v. Mohamed

OCGA § 17-9-4. Additionally, defendant cited no authority for such a motion and we are aware of none. Cf.…

State v. Kight

Held: 1. The state urges that the trial court had no authority to permit Kight to withdraw his plea after the…