From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thermalectric, Inc. v. Still-Man Mfg. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1973
43 A.D.2d 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

December 24, 1973


Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 30, 1973 and made after a hearing, which granted plaintiff's motion to restore the case to the trial calendar. Order modified by adding thereto a provision that the granting of the motion is on condition that plaintiff agree to restoration of defendant's action against plaintiff in Bronx County to the Trial Calendar. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The action was discontinued pursuant to a stipulation entered into by plaintiff's attorney without its representatives' knowledge and consent. This court has the power to relieve plaintiff of such a stipulation if both sides can be restored to substantially their former position ( Humphries v. Shapiro, 187 App. Div. 96). In the case at bar, however, in reliance upon the stipulation, defendant's attorney had another case, one by this defendant against plaintiff, marked "settled". Thus, only if plaintiff's representatives agree to have defendant's case reinstated should plaintiff's action be restored notwithstanding the stipulation of discontinuance. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Latham, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thermalectric, Inc. v. Still-Man Mfg. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 24, 1973
43 A.D.2d 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Thermalectric, Inc. v. Still-Man Mfg. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:THERMALECTRIC, INC., Respondent, v. STILL-MAN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1973

Citations

43 A.D.2d 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Schulman v. Colonial Springs Park Corporation

Plaintiffs' attorneys were notified of the error the following morning and defendant's instant motion to…

Melstein v. Schmid Laboratories, Inc.

Schmid's argument that the parties cannot be restored to the same positions they were in prior to entering…