From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thelen v. Billingsley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 11, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-10212 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 11, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 19-cv-10212

02-11-2019

Patrick Thelen, Petitioner, v. James Billingsley, Respondent.


Mag. Judge David R. Grand OPINION AND ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [1] AS DUPLICATIVE

Petitioner Patrick Thelen, residing at the RRC Halfway House in Saginaw, Michigan, seeks the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his pro se application, Petitioner challenges a disciplinary hearing in which he was found guilty of testing positive in a urinalysis for using amphetamines. This resulted in the loss of 39 days credit. However, for the reasons set forth below, the petition is summarily dismissed as duplicative of an already pending habeas petition.

A suit is duplicative and subject to dismissal if the claims, parties, and available relief do not significantly differ from an earlier-filed action. See Smith v. S.E.C., 129 F.3d 356, 361 (6th Cir. 1997); see also Waad v. Farmers Ins. Exch., No. 18-1588, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 3051, at *10 (6th Cir. Jan. 30, 2019) (stating that a district court can dismiss a duplicative lawsuit based on the inherent authority to manage its own docket.) The current petition challenges the same disciplinary hearing as an earlier petition. There is no meaningful difference between the two matters and, moreover, the earlier petition is still pending in this Court. (Case No. 18-cv-13719; Dkt. 1.) There is no need to litigate the same petition in two parallel proceedings. The current petition is therefore summarily dismissed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. 1) is DISMISSED as a duplicate petition. This dismissal is without prejudice to the earlier filed petition. (Case No. 18-cv-13719; Dkt. 1.)

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 11, 2019

Ann Arbor, Michigan

s/Judith E. Levy

JUDITH E. LEVY

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 11, 2019.

s/Shawna Burns

SHAWNA BURNS

Case Manager


Summaries of

Thelen v. Billingsley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Feb 11, 2019
Case No. 19-cv-10212 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 11, 2019)
Case details for

Thelen v. Billingsley

Case Details

Full title:Patrick Thelen, Petitioner, v. James Billingsley, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 11, 2019

Citations

Case No. 19-cv-10212 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 11, 2019)