Opinion
No. 37266
Decided November 8, 1961.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Sections 2917.06 and 2917.07, Revised Code — Bribery of witness — Intimidating witness — Evidence — Charge to jury.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.
Mr. Earl W. Allison, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Richard J. Brentlinger, for appellee.
Mr. Harold Lieberman, in propria persona.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
ZIMMERMAN, acting C.J., RADCLIFF, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.
ZIMMERMAN, J., sitting in the place and stead of WEYGANDT, C.J.
RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of ZIMMERMAN, J.