From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Seatrain New Orleans

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 23, 1942
127 F.2d 878 (5th Cir. 1942)

Opinion

No. 9975.

April 23, 1942.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Adrian J. Caillouet, Judge.

Libel under the Seamen's Act by John Long against the S.S. Seatrain New Orleans and another to recover additional wages and penalties. From a decree dismissing the libel, libellant appeals.

Affirmed.

Jacob J. Amato, of New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Lloyd A. Ray and Jas. Hy. Bruns, both of New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.


It appearing from the libel, that libellant appellant was given the notice required by, was discharged in accordance with, and was paid the wages due him under, the shipping articles, the district judge, in response to an exception that no cause of action for additional wages and penalties was shown, dismissed the libel.

The shipping articles constituted the contract of employment, Peninsular Occidental S.S. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 98 F.2d 411, they were reasonable and not in violation of any provision of law, and ship and crew were bound by them.

The decree was right. It is affirmed.


Summaries of

The Seatrain New Orleans

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 23, 1942
127 F.2d 878 (5th Cir. 1942)
Case details for

The Seatrain New Orleans

Case Details

Full title:THE SEATRAIN NEW ORLEANS. LONG v. THE SEATRAIN NEW ORLEANS et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 23, 1942

Citations

127 F.2d 878 (5th Cir. 1942)

Citing Cases

Petition of Karlsson

46 U.S.C. 564. This agreement constitutes the contract of employment between the Master and the seaman. The…

Mason v. Texas Co.

Thus, the only question to be determined is what agreement existed between the parties concerning the payment…