From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The People v. Carter

Supreme Court of Illinois
Nov 21, 1945
391 Ill. 594 (Ill. 1945)

Opinion

No. 28625. Judgment affirmed.

Opinion filed November 21, 1945.

WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. STEVENS R. BAKER, Judge, presiding.

HARICE LEROY CARTER, pro se.

GEORGE F. BARRETT, Attorney General, and HUBERT H. EDWARDS, State's Attorney, of Pontiac, for the People.


This is a review on writ of error sued out by plaintiff in error pro se, seeking reversal of a judgment of the circuit court of Livingston county sentencing him to the penitentiary for 99 years on a charge of murder and his plea of guilty thereon. No bill of exceptions has been filed. The only questions, therefore, that this court can consider are those on the common-law record.

His first contention is that the court erred in not appointing an attorney to represent him during arraignment. The right to be represented by counsel is one which the defendant may waive or claim, as he shall determine. No duty rests upon the court to provide legal assistance for an accused, unless he states, under his oath, his inability to procure counsel, and expresses a desire to have the court appoint one for him. (People v. Braner, 389 Ill. 190; People v. Corrie, 387 Ill. 587; People v. Childers, 386 Ill. 312.) There being no bill of exceptions, and it not appearing that plaintiff in error sought to have an attorney appointed for him, this assignment of error cannot be sustained. People v. Stubblefield, post, p. 609; People v. Stack, ante, p. 15; People v. Braner, 389 Ill. 190.

Others errors assigned relate to his complaint that he was deprived of due process of law by reason of the method of his arrest and that he did not have a fair trial based upon competent evidence. There is no basis in the common-law record on which the court can review such questions. Therefore they cannot be considered. People v. Lantz, 387 Ill. 72; People v. Bertrand, 385 Ill. 289; People v. Keller, 353 Ill. 411.

The judgment of the circuit court of Livingston county is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

The People v. Carter

Supreme Court of Illinois
Nov 21, 1945
391 Ill. 594 (Ill. 1945)
Case details for

The People v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Defendant in Error, vs. HARICE LEROY…

Court:Supreme Court of Illinois

Date published: Nov 21, 1945

Citations

391 Ill. 594 (Ill. 1945)
63 N.E.2d 763

Citing Cases

Carter v. Illinois

Pp. 177-180. 2. Designation of counsel to assist defendant at time of sentencing does not imply that he was…

The People v. Loftus

But in any event, this court's jurisdiction on writ of error, as distinguished from its jurisdiction or that…