From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Hocking Valley Railway Company v. Barbour

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 1, 1921
130 N.E. 909 (N.Y. 1921)

Opinion

Argued January 12, 1921

Decided February 1, 1921

John H. Corwin for appellants.

James H. Purdy, Jr., and A. Von Bernuth for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

The Hocking Valley Railway Company v. Barbour

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 1, 1921
130 N.E. 909 (N.Y. 1921)
Case details for

The Hocking Valley Railway Company v. Barbour

Case Details

Full title:THE HOCKING VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent, v . JULIA A. BARBOUR et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 1, 1921

Citations

130 N.E. 909 (N.Y. 1921)
130 N.E. 909

Citing Cases

Whalen v. Balto. Ohio R. Co.

Apart from the fact that the change from Dorsey's Run of the location of the main stem of the appellee's…

Feinbloom v. Friedman

The account was used thereafter in the partnership business, and it is undisputed that the plaintiff was…