From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Garden City

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Sep 18, 1916
236 F. 302 (N.D. Cal. 1916)

Opinion


236 F. 302 (N.D.Cal. 1916) THE GARDEN CITY. No. 15418. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 18, 1916

Ira S. Lillick, of San Francisco, Cal., for libelant.

Andros & Hengstler, E. J. Foulds, and G. W. Bell, all of San Francisco, Cal., for claimant.

DOOLING, District Judge.

The Garden City collided with the Klamath in a dense fog, inflicting substantial injury; herself being uninjured. The owner of the Klamath filed a libel in this court alleging that the collision was due solely to the fault of the Garden City. The latter answered averring that the collision was due solely to the fault of the Klamath. There was no cross-libel. The court found that both vessels were at fault and ordered that a decree be entered for divided damages. A decree has now been presented assessing against the Garden City one-half of the damage sustained by the Klamath. Libelant now claims full costs. Respondent contends that the costs, like the damages, should be divided. This contention seems to be in accord with the settled rule in such cases. The Edward Luckenback (D.C.) 94 F. 544; The Bermuda (D.C.) 128 F. 816; The Gladiator (D.C.) 223 F. 381.

The costs will therefore be divided.


Summaries of

The Garden City

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Sep 18, 1916
236 F. 302 (N.D. Cal. 1916)
Case details for

The Garden City

Case Details

Full title:THE GARDEN CITY.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 18, 1916

Citations

236 F. 302 (N.D. Cal. 1916)

Citing Cases

Pike R. P. v. Minneapolis, St. P. S.S.M.R

Defendant's only right under the circumstances was that plaintiff should not wilfully, wantonly, maliciously…