From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thalenberg v. Rosenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1996
226 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant's second, sixth, and ninth affirmative defenses to the third-party action; his first, third, and fourth counterclaims; and the fourth-party action were properly dismissed. The appellant's allegations — which sound in negligence, misrepresentation, fraud, detrimental reliance, contribution and indemnity — were conclusory, unsubstantiated, or raise no triable issues of fact ( see, Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 395, 404; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557; Wagner v. Triefler, 215 A.D.2d 648; Jaffer v. Miles, 209 A.D.2d 672; Grinblat v. Taubenblat, 107 A.D.2d 735). Mangano, P.J., Miller, Ritter and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Thalenberg v. Rosenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 8, 1996
226 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Thalenberg v. Rosenfeld

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN THALENBERG, Plaintiff, v. JUDITH ROSENFELD et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 8, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 446 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
640 N.Y.S.2d 784