From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

T.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 18, 1983
431 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-1915.

May 18, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Manatee County, Claflin Garst, Jr., Acting J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Deborah A. Adamson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Theda James Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


T.F., a sixteen year old child, was adjudicated delinquent for possession of alcohol by a minor (count I) and a violation of Bradenton Beach, Fla., Ordinance No. 110 (1969) (count II). She attacks the constitutionality of the curfew ordinance (No. 110) which reads in pertinent part as follows:

SECTION 1.

It shall be unlawful for any person sixteen (16) years of age or under to be on the streets, alleys or other public places within the City limits of Bradenton Beach, Florida, between the hours of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M.

SECTION 2.

All persons sixteen (16) years of age or under shall be exempt from the provisions of SECTION 1. hereunder when they are in the company of an adult.

We hereby declare ordinance No. 110 unconstitutional for the reasons set forth in our opinion issued this date in S.W. v. State, 431 So.2d 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). The rationale of that case is more compelling here because the Bradenton Beach ordinance does not even purport to make exceptions for legitimate nocturnal pursuits of minors in public places.

T.F. admitted the charge of possession of alcohol. Therefore, notwithstanding the invalidity of the ordinance, we affirm the order of commitment predicated on count I.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

T.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 18, 1983
431 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

T.F. v. State

Case Details

Full title:T.F., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 18, 1983

Citations

431 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

State v. T.M

Other courts, including this court, have struck down such ordinances for being overly broad, vague, or for…

A.R. v. State

We find that the items referred to in testimony at trial were not sufficiently identified as being the…