Opinion
August 22, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof which granted the motions of the sureties for summary judgment and the motion of the defendant E.K. Construction Co., Inc., for leave to serve a supplemental pleading, and substituting therefor provisions denying those motions; and as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the plaintiff payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
Material issues of fact exist regarding the sureties' obligation to the plaintiff pursuant to the terms of the payment bond, precluding the granting of summary judgment (see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320). We further find that the proposed amended answer of the defendant E.K. Construction Co., Inc., which includes a counterclaim for specific performance, is lacking in merit, and leave to amend should not have been granted (see, CPLR 3025 [b]). Specific performance is not available as a remedy for breach of contract where, as here, there is an adequate remedy at law (i.e., money damages) (see, Muller v Muller, 266 N.Y. 68; 96 N.Y. Jur 2d, Specific Performance, § 8).
We have reviewed the plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Altman, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.