From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texas Disposal Sys. v. Perez

Supreme Court of Texas
Aug 22, 2002
80 S.W.3d 593 (Tex. 2002)

Summary

holding that court of appeals erred in failing to consider appellee's alternative basis for awarding attorney's fees

Summary of this case from Sloan v. Law Office of Oscar C. Gonzalez, Inc.

Opinion

No. 01-0835

Opinion Delivered: June 27, 2002 Rehearing Denied August 22, 2002

On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas

Lawrence D. Smith, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak Stewart, PC, Mark G. Sessions, Holland Knight, San Antonio, for petitioner.

Rosemarie Kanusky, Jeffrey Lee Bryan, W. Wendell Hall, Robert M. Moore, Houston, Fulbright Jaworski, Scott R. McLaughlin, Houston, for Respondents.


Texas Disposal Systems, Inc. (TDS) sued its former employees, Albert Perez, Jose Maldonado, and Raul Gutierrez, for violating covenants not to compete contained in their employment contracts. TDS sought injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs. The trial court enjoined the former employees from participating in certain activities, reformed the covenants to limit their effective time period to one year, and awarded TDS attorney's fees and costs. The court of appeals reversed the attorney's fee award, concluding that TDS was not entitled to attorney's fees under Texas Business and Commerce Code section 15.51(c) (the Covenant Not to Compete Act). 53 S.W.3d 480, 483. The court of appeals acknowledged that TDS also sought attorney's fees under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 38.001(8). 53 S.W.3d at 481. Nevertheless, the court did not consider whether TDS was entitled to attorney's fees under this provision.

The court of appeals is obligated to hand down a written opinion that "addresses every issue raised and necessary to final disposition of the appeal." Tex.R.App.P. 47.1; see Office of Pub. Util. Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 878 S.W.2d 598, 599-600 (Tex. 1994). Because the court of appeals did not consider the alternative basis that TDS asserted to support the attorney's fees award, we remand the case to the court of appeals to consider this point. Accordingly, without hearing oral argument, Tex.R.App.P. 59.1, we grant TDS's petition for review, reverse the court of appeals' judgment, and remand the case to the court of appeals for further consideration in accordance with this opinion.


Summaries of

Texas Disposal Sys. v. Perez

Supreme Court of Texas
Aug 22, 2002
80 S.W.3d 593 (Tex. 2002)

holding that court of appeals erred in failing to consider appellee's alternative basis for awarding attorney's fees

Summary of this case from Sloan v. Law Office of Oscar C. Gonzalez, Inc.

holding lower court's opinion was incomplete in case involving former employee who was enjoined from competing with employer

Summary of this case from BioTE Med. v. Carrozzella
Case details for

Texas Disposal Sys. v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:Texas Disposal Systems, Inc., Petitioner v. Albert Perez, Jose Maldonado…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Aug 22, 2002

Citations

80 S.W.3d 593 (Tex. 2002)

Citing Cases

West v. Robinson

Consequently, the court of appeals did not comply with Rule 47.1. See Tex. Disposal Sys., Inc. v. Perez, 80…

Sloan v. Law Office of Oscar C. Gonzalez, Inc.

Under rule 47.1, a court of appeals must address the parties' alternative theories of recovery if they are…