From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tempo Carpet Company v. Collectible Classic Cars

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 9, 1983
166 Ga. App. 564 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

65873.

DECIDED MAY 9, 1983.

Action on lease. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Moran.

Charles W. Field, for appellant.

George H. Freisem III, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment to one of the two defendants originally is this case. Following a jury trial the trial court directed a verdict against the plaintiff on his complaint and the jury returned a verdict on the remaining defendant's counterclaim against the plaintiff. Plaintiff brings this appeal.

The record contains eighteen enumerations of error which can only be resolved by reference to the evidence referred to in the orders complained of in this appeal. No transcript of evidence was forwarded with this record and none was ordered filed by plaintiff in its notice of appeal. Plaintiff instructed the Clerk "to transmit the entire record on appeal and to omit nothing." However, our Code also directs that "the notice shall state whether or not any transcript of evidence and proceedings is to be transmitted as part of the record on appeal." OCGA § 5-6-37 (formerly Code Ann. § 6-802).

Our Supreme Court has held: "The notice in the present appeal did not state whether a transcript of the evidence would be filed. The specification that `nothing' is to be omitted from the record would not infer that the transcript is to be included, since the appellant is required to state whether the transcript will be filed, in addition to designating any portion of the record to be omitted." Steadham v. State, 224 Ga. 78, 80 ( 159 S.E.2d 397); Accord: Aviation Electronics v. U.S. Energy Conservation Systems, 242 Ga. 224 ( 248 S.E.2d 610).

"Where no transcript is included in the record on appeal we must assume that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment." Burns v. Barnes, 154 Ga. App. 802 (1) ( 270 S.E.2d 57); Moore v. Morgan, 162 Ga. App. 639 ( 292 S.E.2d 514). Accordingly, we must affirm the judgment of the trial court. City of Atlanta v. Barton, 153 Ga. App. 426 ( 265 S.E.2d 345).

Judgment affirmed. Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

DECIDED MAY 9, 1983.


Summaries of

Tempo Carpet Company v. Collectible Classic Cars

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 9, 1983
166 Ga. App. 564 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Tempo Carpet Company v. Collectible Classic Cars

Case Details

Full title:TEMPO CARPET COMPANY v. COLLECTIBLE CLASSIC CARS OF GEORGIA, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 9, 1983

Citations

166 Ga. App. 564 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
305 S.E.2d 26

Citing Cases

Yetman v. Walsh

Steadham v. State of Ga., 224 Ga. 78, 80 (1) ( 159 SE2d 397) (1968).Tempo Carpet Co. v. Collectible Classic…

Stillman v. Tempo Carpets, Inc.

Appellant, the owner of the building leased to appellee Tempo Carpets, Inc. ("Tempo"), filed a warrant to…