From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Temple v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 27, 2013
132 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2013)

Opinion

No. SC13–1359.

2013-12-27

Robert G. TEMPLE, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Because a writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct the manner in which a court shall act in the lawful exercise of its jurisdiction, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. State ex rel. North St. Lucie River Drainage Dist. v. Kanner, 11 So.2d 889, 890 (Fla.1943); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So.2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus “is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision nor is it proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act”), approved, 431 So.2d 986 (Fla.1983).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Temple v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 27, 2013
132 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2013)
Case details for

Temple v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert G. TEMPLE, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Dec 27, 2013

Citations

132 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2013)