From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Temple v. Providence Care Ctr., LLC

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Mar 26, 2019
205 A.3d 312 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 309 WAL 2018

03-26-2019

James TEMPLE, as Attorney-in-Fact FOR Elma Betty TEMPLE, Petitioner v. PROVIDENCE CARE CENTER, LLC d/b/a Providence Care Center, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Did the Superior Court disregard decades of controlling Supreme Court precedent by affirming the grant of a new trial based upon errors that were not preserved properly at the time of trial?


Summaries of

Temple v. Providence Care Ctr., LLC

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Mar 26, 2019
205 A.3d 312 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Temple v. Providence Care Ctr., LLC

Case Details

Full title:JAMES TEMPLE, AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR ELMA BETTY TEMPLE, Petitioner v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 26, 2019

Citations

205 A.3d 312 (Pa. 2019)

Citing Cases

Temple v. Providence Care Ctr.

Did the Superior Court disregard decades of controlling Supreme Court precedent by affirming the grant of a…

Temple v. Providence Care Ctr.

Did the Superior Court disregard decades of controlling Supreme Court precedent by affirming the grant of a…