From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Telles v. Cnty. of Stanislaus

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 6, 2016
No. 14-15032 (9th Cir. Oct. 6, 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-15032

10-06-2016

HENRY WILLIAM TELLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; et al., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00982-AWI-BAM MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Henry William Telles appeals pro se from the district court's judgment following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We cannot review any of Telles' contentions challenging his jury trial because Telles has failed to provide the relevant pre-trial and trial transcripts required to review the alleged errors. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing appeal by pro se appellant for failure to provide trial transcripts).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Telles v. Cnty. of Stanislaus

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 6, 2016
No. 14-15032 (9th Cir. Oct. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Telles v. Cnty. of Stanislaus

Case Details

Full title:HENRY WILLIAM TELLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; et…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 6, 2016

Citations

No. 14-15032 (9th Cir. Oct. 6, 2016)