From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Televisa S.A. De C.V. v. DTVLA WC Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 7, 2004
374 F.3d 1384 (9th Cir. 2004)

Summary

withdrawing opinion after recognizing that FAA § 16(b) stripped the court of appellate jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Accenture LLP v. Spreng

Opinion

No. 02-56798.

Argued and Submitted December 1, 2003.

Filed July 7, 2004.

Patricia L. Glaser, H. Seong Kim, Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil Shapiro, LLP, Helen B. Kim, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver Jacobson, Los Angeles, CA, Douglas H. Flaum, Brett D. Jaffe, Lisa H. Bebchick, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver Jacobson, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Robert D. Crockett, Robert K. Lu, Latham Watkins, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Lourdes G. Baird, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-05862-LGB.

Before GOODWIN, BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.

The Honorable William W. Schwarzer, Senior United States District Court Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.


ORDER

After further consideration and review of the parties' supplemental briefs, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over Televisa's appeal. See Bushley v. Credit Suisse First Boston, 360 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9th Cir. 2004).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Televisa S.A. De C.V. v. DTVLA WC Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 7, 2004
374 F.3d 1384 (9th Cir. 2004)

withdrawing opinion after recognizing that FAA § 16(b) stripped the court of appellate jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Accenture LLP v. Spreng
Case details for

Televisa S.A. De C.V. v. DTVLA WC Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TELEVISA S.A. DE C.V., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DTVLA WC INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 7, 2004

Citations

374 F.3d 1384 (9th Cir. 2004)

Citing Cases

Accenture LLP v. Spreng

Id.See also ON Equity Sales Co. v. Pals, 528 F.3d 564, 567-68 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that while the court…