Opinion
Argued May 4, 1887
Decided June 7, 1887
William F. O'Neil for appellant.
William Vanamee for respondent.
Per Curiam mem. for affirmance of judgment.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Teets v. the Village of Middletown
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 7, 1887
106 N.Y. 651 (N.Y. 1887)
Summaries of
Teets v. the Village of Middletown
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 7, 1887
106 N.Y. 651 (N.Y. 1887)
Case details for
Teets v. the Village of Middletown
Case Details
Full title:JOSIE TEETS, Respondent, v . THE VILLAGE OF MIDDLETOWN, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 7, 1887
Citations
106 N.Y. 651 (N.Y. 1887)
8 N.Y. St. Rptr. 214
12 N.E. 705
Citing Cases
Armstrong Co. v. Shell Co., of California
fore the royalties have accrued), may not set up the supposed invalidity of the patent and the consequent…