From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

T.C. Morrow Drilling Company v. Javelin Oil Company

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division
Mar 14, 1967
266 F. Supp. 119 (W.D. La. 1967)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 12488.

March 14, 1967.

William E. Skye, Gold, Hall Skye, Alexandria, La., John T. Guyton, Hargrove, Guyton, Van Hook Ramey, Shreveport, La., for plaintiff.

Marion K. Smith, Shreveport, La., for defendant.


OPINION ON MOTION TO REMAND


Defendant timely removed this case from State district court. Plaintiff filed a motion to remand alleging that defendant improperly removed because defendant is a citizen of Louisiana.

In its petition for removal, defendant clearly admits that it is a citizen of Louisiana and that its principal place of business is in Louisiana. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b), a defendant who is a citizen of the state where the action is brought cannot remove the action. Thus the removal was patently improper, and the motion to remand must be granted. An order of remand has been signed and placed in the record.


Summaries of

T.C. Morrow Drilling Company v. Javelin Oil Company

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division
Mar 14, 1967
266 F. Supp. 119 (W.D. La. 1967)
Case details for

T.C. Morrow Drilling Company v. Javelin Oil Company

Case Details

Full title:T.C. MORROW DRILLING COMPANY v. JAVELIN OIL COMPANY, Inc

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Shreveport Division

Date published: Mar 14, 1967

Citations

266 F. Supp. 119 (W.D. La. 1967)

Citing Cases

Greater New York Mut. Ins. Co. v. Anchor Const. Co.

Since the original action was instituted in a State forum, however, the case is not removable because the…

E. Jey Kim v. Sung Kwon Lee

Consistent with that understanding, courts have not hesitated to apply the forum-defendant rule in cases like…