From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 5, 1952
92 A.2d 757 (Md. 1952)

Opinion

[H.C. No. 21, October Term, 1952.]

Decided December 5, 1952.

HABEAS CORPUS — Lack of Speedy Trial. A prisoner cannot be released on habeas corpus after conviction merely because his trial was improperly delayed. p. 657

HABEAS CORPUS — Bail Excessive. The fact that the bail was was excessive cannot be raised on habeas corpus. p. 657

Decided December 5, 1952.

Habeas corpus proceeding by William Taylor against Warden of Maryland House of Correction. From a refusal of the writ, petitioner applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Before MARKELL, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS and HENDERSON, JJ.


This application was made by William Taylor for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner alleges that he was convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore on the charge of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and was sentenced to the Maryland House of Correction, but that he is being confined in that institution illegally. He complains (1) that he was held in jail for 52 days before he was tried and thus was denied the right to a speedy trial; and (2) that the bail fixed by the Court was excessive.

First, a prisoner cannot be released on habeas corpus after conviction merely because his trial was improperly delayed. Ruben v. Welch, 159 F.2d 493.

Secondly, the fact that bail fixed by the Court was excessive does not vitiate the prisoner's conviction and therefore cannot be raised on habeas corpus.

Application denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 5, 1952
92 A.2d 757 (Md. 1952)
Case details for

Taylor v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:TAYLOR v . WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 5, 1952

Citations

92 A.2d 757 (Md. 1952)
92 A.2d 757

Citing Cases

Wagner v. Warden

We have repeatedly held that after trial and conviction the legality of arrest and extent or legality of…

Medley v. Warden

Whatever the scope of that right may be, as regards pending indictments for other crimes, on which he…