holding that the plaintiff had not met their burden in proving that pallet in shopping aisle created an unreasonable risk of harm because it was plainly visible
Summary of this case from Nunez v. Dolgencorp, LLCCivil Action No. 05-1346-A.
May 23, 2006
For the reasons stated in the ruling accompanying this Judgment, Defendant Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 19) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff Gracie Taylor's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
holding that the plaintiff had not met their burden in proving that pallet in shopping aisle created an unreasonable risk of harm because it was plainly visible
Summary of this case from Nunez v. Dolgencorp, LLCconcluding that plaintiff's momentary distraction “did not transform the clearly visible pallet into an unreasonably dangerous condition.”
Summary of this case from Hicks v. Costco Wholesale Corp.In Taylor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2006 WL 1476031 (W.D. La. May 23, 2006), the Court found no duty existed by the merchant to a customer who tripped over a pallet left in the middle of the floor/aisle.
Summary of this case from Hart v. Lowe's Home Ctrs. LLCFull title:GRACIE TAYLOR v. WAL-MART STORES, INC
Court:United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division
Date published: May 23, 2006
See Russell v. Morgan's Bestway of Louisiana, LLC, 47,914, pp. 7-8 (La.App. 2 Cir. 4/10/13), 113 So.3d 448,…
Watters v. Wal-Mart La., LLCAs to the likelihood and magnitude of harm, federal and Louisiana state courts have generally held that a…