From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Northwest Education Loan Association

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Oct 13, 2009
3:09CV235 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009)

Summary

granting a motion for more definite statement when "Plaintiff refer[red] generally to the 'defendant' without specifying which Defendant he is referring to and without referring to the particular acts of each Defendant."

Summary of this case from Alston v. Ourisman Chevrolet

Opinion

3:09CV235.

October 13, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the court upon Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The pro se Plaintiff has failed to file a response in opposition to the motion.

Defendants are the guarantor of a student loan made to the Plaintiff, the servicer of that loan, and two collection agencies who were retained to collect on the loan. The Plaintiff filed his Complaint pro se and the Complaint appears to allege seven causes of action. However, throughout the Complaint, the Plaintiff refers generally to the "defendant(s)" without specifying which Defendant he is referring to and without referring to the particular acts of each Defendant. The Plaintiff also makes broad references to violations of the "Fair Credit Collection Practices Act" and the "Consumer Protection Act" and does not allege a clear time frame in which the alleged actions occurred.

A motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) is appropriate if a pleading is so vague or ambiguous that a defendant cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading. Doe v. Bayer Corp., 367F.Supp. 904, 917 (M.D.N.C. 2005). After reviewing this Complaint, the court finds that the Plaintiff's allegations are conclusory at best. It is impossible to determine which Defendant allegedly did what. Without a clear expression of the factual and legal grounds upon which Plaintiff relies, Defendants are unable to reasonably frame a response. Accordingly,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement is hereby GRANTED, and Plaintiff is hereby directed to replead his Complaint within ten (10) days, asserting which actions alleged are attributable to each defendant, when they occurred and the specific statute under which the Plaintiff is proceeding.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Northwest Education Loan Association

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Oct 13, 2009
3:09CV235 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009)

granting a motion for more definite statement when "Plaintiff refer[red] generally to the 'defendant' without specifying which Defendant he is referring to and without referring to the particular acts of each Defendant."

Summary of this case from Alston v. Ourisman Chevrolet
Case details for

Taylor v. Northwest Education Loan Association

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP JORDAN TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. NORTHWEST EDUCATION LOAN ASSOCIATION…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Oct 13, 2009

Citations

3:09CV235 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

Alston v. Ourisman Chevrolet

in the case caption because there are multiple defendants. ECF No. 19-3 at 4. He also refers to several…