From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Monongahela Railway Company

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 14, 1958
256 F.2d 751 (3d Cir. 1958)

Opinion

No. 12490.

Argued June 12, 1958.

Decided July 14, 1958.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; John W. McIlvaine, Judge.

John David Rhodes, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Pringle, Bredin Martin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Albert D. Brandon, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Frederic G. Weir, Calvin K. Prine, Oliver, Brandon Shearer, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.


In an action by an employee of the defendant under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., the jury found in his favor and awarded damages of $45,000.00. Defendant's motion for a new trial was denied and this appeal followed.

The issues presented are whether certain medical testimony was properly admitted and whether the District Court properly charged the jury with respect to future medical and hospital expenses.

On review of the record we find no basic or prejudicial error in the admission of the medical testimony complained of or in the District Court's instructions to the jury with respect to future medical and hospital expenses.

The Order of the District Court, 155 F. Supp. 601, denying defendant's motion for a new trial will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Monongahela Railway Company

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jul 14, 1958
256 F.2d 751 (3d Cir. 1958)
Case details for

Taylor v. Monongahela Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:Smith H. TAYLOR v. The MONONGAHELA RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jul 14, 1958

Citations

256 F.2d 751 (3d Cir. 1958)

Citing Cases

Seawell v. Brame

In Spaulding v. City of Edina, supra, the admission of the testimony of a practicing physician concerning the…