From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. D.O.C. Comm'r Dora Schriro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 13, 2012
11 Civ. 6892 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2012)

Opinion

11 Civ. 6892 (DAB)

08-13-2012

ZARNOFF TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. D.O.C. COMMISSIONER DORA SCHRIRO, ET AL., Defendants.


ADOPTION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DEBORAH A. BATTS, United States District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the July 24, 2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein (the "Report"). Judge Gorenstein's Report recommends that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss should be GRANTED. (Report at 1, 7.)

"Within fourteen days after being served with a copy [of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation], a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); accord 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court may adopt those portions of the report to which no timely objection has been made, so long as there is no clear error on the face of the record. Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 262 F.Supp.2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). w[F]ailure to object timely to a magistrate's report operates as a waiver of any further judicial review of the magistrate's decision." Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Small v. Sec, of HHS, 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989)). This rule applies to pro se parties so long as the magistrate's report "explicitly states that failure to object to the report within [fourteen (14)] days will preclude appellate review..." Small, 892 F.2d at 16.

Despite being advised of the procedure for filing objections in Judge Gorenstein's Report, and warned that failure to file objections would waive objections and preclude appellate review, (Report at 7-8), Plaintiff Taylor has filed no objections to the Report. Nor has any other Party filed objections to the Report.

Having reviewed the Report, and finding no clear error on the face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein, dated July 24, 2012, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED in its entirety and Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed, with prejudice.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

August 13, 2012

______________________

Deborah A. Batts

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Taylor v. D.O.C. Comm'r Dora Schriro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 13, 2012
11 Civ. 6892 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Taylor v. D.O.C. Comm'r Dora Schriro

Case Details

Full title:ZARNOFF TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. D.O.C. COMMISSIONER DORA SCHRIRO, ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 13, 2012

Citations

11 Civ. 6892 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Paul v. Bailey

v. 1515, 2011 WL 3962596, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2011) ("Although Williams may have been in discomfort for…

Jones v. Stephanie NG

Stevens v. City of N.Y,, 12 Civ. 3808, 2013 WL 81327 at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2013), aff'd, 541 F. App'x 111…