From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Diamond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

February, 1934.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.


Order of filiation of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, and order denying motion that blood tests be taken, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The case of Hayt v. Brewster, Gordon Co., Inc. ( 199 App. Div. 68) was determined on the statute (formerly section 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure, now section 306 of the Civil Practice Act). In the absence of statutory authority, the Court of Special Sessions in a paternity proceeding may not compel blood tests to be taken. There is no such authority to be found in the Inferior Criminal Courts Act (Art. V), relating to paternity proceedings triable exclusively in the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Diamond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Taylor v. Diamond

Case Details

Full title:FRANK J. TAYLOR, Commissioner of Public Welfare of the City of New York…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

United States v. Shaughnessy

An applicant's refusal to submit to a blood test raises the logical inference that he knows that paternity…

Beach v. Beach

In re Lentz, 247 App. Div. 31, 283 N.Y.S. 749, 753; In re Swahn's Will, 158 Misc. 17, 285 N.Y.S. 234…