From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Cheatham

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Feb 19, 1968
206 So. 2d 837 (Miss. 1968)

Summary

In Cheatham v. Taylor, 148 Va. 26, 39, 138 S.E. 545, we said "that the right of a third person to the protection of the [restrictive] covenant is an equitable right by whatever name called."

Summary of this case from Meagher v. Appalachian Power Co.

Opinion

No. 44720.

January 22, 1968. Suggestion of Error Overruled February 19, 1968.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Leon F. Hendrick, J.

Satterfield, Shell, Williams Buford, K. Hayes Callicutt, Jackson, for appellant.

Henley, Jones Henley, Richard M. Edmonson, Jackson, for appellee.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Cheatham

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Feb 19, 1968
206 So. 2d 837 (Miss. 1968)

In Cheatham v. Taylor, 148 Va. 26, 39, 138 S.E. 545, we said "that the right of a third person to the protection of the [restrictive] covenant is an equitable right by whatever name called."

Summary of this case from Meagher v. Appalachian Power Co.

In Cheatham v. Taylor, 148 Va. 26, 138 S.E. 545, it appears that Cheatham, at considerable expense, after protest by Taylor, erected an addition to the front of his drug store situated on Rivermont Avenue in the city of Lynchburg, in violation of the residential rights of Taylor.

Summary of this case from Mullins v. Morgan
Case details for

Taylor v. Cheatham

Case Details

Full title:Wilbert TAYLOR, Jim Richards and Willard L. Johnston v. Christine…

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi

Date published: Feb 19, 1968

Citations

206 So. 2d 837 (Miss. 1968)

Citing Cases

Meagher v. Appalachian Power Co.

(Italics supplied.) In Cheatham v. Taylor, 148 Va. 26, 39, 138 S.E. 545, we said "that the right of a third…

Springer v. Gaddy

It is true that in this class of cases the awarding of an injunction is addressed to the conscience of the…