Summary
In Tausik v Tausik (9 N.Y.2d 664) summary proceedings were authorized because the husband and wife had voluntarily separated and had executed a written agreement signed by the wife which was held to constitute a license to use the husband's property.
Summary of this case from Padilla v. PadillaOpinion
Argued November 29, 1960
Decided January 19, 1961
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GUY GILBERT RIBAUDO, J.
Sidney A. Wolff and Joseph F. Seminara for appellant.
Meyer Kraushaar for respondent.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Motion to strike certain matter from the brief of respondent on the appeal herein granted upon the ground that the separation action was not considered below and reference to it is unnecessary to the result reached.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.