From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tausend v. N.J.R. Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 2009
67 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1382.

November 5, 2009.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered April 30, 2009, dismissing the petition to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Dewey LeBoeuf LLP, New York (John G. Nicolich of counsel), for appellant.

Siller Wilk LLP, New York (Alan D. Zuckerbrod of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Sweeny, J.P., Buckley, Catterson, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.


The court correctly granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition to stay arbitration. There is insufficient evidence of record to substantiate petitioner's claim that she was induced by fraud to enter into the arbitration agreement, and it has not been shown that the entire partnership agreement was permeated by fraud so as to invalidate the arbitration provision ( see Matter of Weinrott [Carp], 32 NY2d 190, 197).


Summaries of

Tausend v. N.J.R. Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 2009
67 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Tausend v. N.J.R. Associates

Case Details

Full title:NICOLE TAUSEND, as a Limited Partner of N.J.R. ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 5, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7958
886 N.Y.S.2d 884