From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tattenham v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Feb 16, 1909
155 Cal. 205 (Cal. 1909)

Opinion

S.F. No. 5195.

February 16, 1909.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari directed to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Henry B. Lister, for Petitioners.

Bush Finnell, for Respondent.


This is a petition for the writ of certiorari. It is alleged that the petitioners have been enjoined in an action to which they were not parties, and therefore not subject to the jurisdiction of the court granting the injunction. If they can appeal it is conceded they have no right to the writ, and there is no doubt that they can appeal by making themselves parties in the manner pointed out in Elliott v. Superior Court, 144 Cal. 509, [103 Am. St. Rep. 102, 77 P. 1109].

Writ denied.


Summaries of

Tattenham v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Feb 16, 1909
155 Cal. 205 (Cal. 1909)
Case details for

Tattenham v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL TATTENHAM et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND…

Court:Supreme Court of California,In Bank

Date published: Feb 16, 1909

Citations

155 Cal. 205 (Cal. 1909)
100 P. 248

Citing Cases

Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Company

(Code Civ. Proc., sec. 956.) The appellant seeks to avoid the effect of this reasoning by a reference to the…

Luckenbach v. Laer

Their motions being denied, they may, on this appeal, have the proceedings of which they complain reviewed. (…