Summary
rejecting argument that a negligent misrepresentation claim should be recognized as separate from a product liability claim, noting that “[t]he law is clear that Louisiana imposes on a manufacturer no duty to warn of the dangers of another company's product”
Summary of this case from Esposito v. Eli Lilly & Co. (In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Prods. Liab. Litig.)Opinion
Civil Action 3-04-2036.
January 26, 2006
JUDGMENT
For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law,
IT IS ORDERED that the Wyeth, Inc.'s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings [Doc. No. 69] is GRANTED, and plaintiffs' claims against Wyeth, Inc. for negligent misrepresentation/failure to warn are dismissed.